|
Revised April 17, 2008
It
is said that the difference between neurotic and psychotic people is
that neurotic people "dream" about castles in the air, while psychotic
people "live" in castles in the air.
Adolph
Hitler, I believe, was psychotic for many reasons. But for the purposes
of this message, I will give only two reasons why Hitler was psychotic.
Firstly, he thought he could conquer the Earth. Secondly he thought he
could kill all the Jews on the face of the Earth. Both ideas represent
psychoses in my opinion.
Firstly,
conquering the Earth is an impossibility. Any one who thinks he can
conquer the Earth is psychotic; he is living in castles in the air.
Just as Hitler thought he could conquer the Earth, so, too, did
Alexander the Great, the Romans, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, and Stalin.
They were all psychotic, living in castles in the air. As a person who
believes in God, I believe only the Lord has dominion over the Earth.
Secondly,
Hitler thought he could kill all the Jews. Now, there are two types of
people: Those who believe in God and those who don't. For those who
believe in God, and His Bible, it is impossible to kill the Jews
because God says in Jeremiah 31:25 that there will be no more Jews on
the Earth when the sun, moon and stars stop shining, i.e. the end of
the Earth and civilization.
But
for those who don't believe in God and His Bible, about 4 billion human
beings, they, too, know that the Jews have been scattered to the four
corners of the Earth. If you can't conquer the Earth (1st psychosis)
you can't reach all the Jews to kill them (2nd psychosis).
Now,
without going into a deep investigation of Islam (which is what I have
done in my first four books), I think it is fair to say that Islam
wishes to conquer the Earth (Psychosis #1). Islam plans to kill every
last Jew on the Earth (Psychosis #2). Up to here, this makes Islam just
as psychotic as Hitler's Nazism. But then, even more so, Islam plans to
kill two billion Christians which was not party of Nazism's plan.
(Psychosis #3) (By the way it must be remembered by all and Moslems
will never deny this that Jews and Christians together are the PEOPLE
of the Book, not two peoples but one people. The only difference
between Jews and Christians in the eyes of Islam is that Jews keep the
Sabbath on Saturday, and Christians keep the Sabbath on Sunday.
Together the Jews and Christians are called in Arabic: "Ahel al-Kitab"
or People of the Book. Therefore, Moslems have a saying: We kill the
Jews on Saturday and the Christians on Sunday.)
Then
Islam plans to kill the pagans: The Hindus, Buddhists and Blacks.
That's psychosis #4. And finally, if you tally this all up, 1.3 billion
Moslems think they will get away with annihilating 5 billion
non-Moslems. That's psychosis #5.
Then
when they have finished off five billion non-Moslems, the Moslems will
turn on each other Shiites killing Sunnis and vice-versa, Psychosis #6.
So, it would seem to me that Islam is a psychosis of killing and the annihilation of all mankind.
A
firestorm of Islamic protests was aroused by Pope Benedict XVI as a
result of his visit to his native Germany and his address to the
science faculty of the University of Regensburg on September 12th,
2006.
His
address dealt mainly with the relationship between faith and reason,
but that theme was eclipsed by the Pope's comments on Islam. These
comments were made with respect to a statement made by "the erudite
Byzantine emperor Manuel II Palaiologos" just after the year 1391 as
part of debate with a Persian scholar (Dialogue 7 of Twenty-six
Dialogues with a Persian), in which the Emperor stated: "Show me just
what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only
evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith
he preached." He then continues, saying, "God is not pleased by blood –
and not acting reasonably (syn logo) is contrary to God's nature."
Since
psychosis is a way of not acting reasonably, I would venture to say
that "God is not pleased by blood and irrational behavior." Islam is indeed irrational behavior bent on the destruction of all non-Moslems at first and Moslems later.
The
discourse by Palaiologos continues: "Faith is born of the soul, not the
body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak
well and to reason properly, without violence and threats… To convince
a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm or weapons of any
kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death…"
On
the one hand, there is this deception around the world that Islam is a
religion of peace, but Islam calls itself the Religion of the Sword or
in Arabic "Din e-seif". No Arabic speaking Moslem will deny this. Allah
al-Ilahi is the moon god, the sword god and the war god. The god Allah
is "greater" than the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, who is
considered a weak, sissy love and peace God. Their god, Allah, is the
macho sword and war god. This is the true meaning of the Moslem call to
prayer "Allahu Akbar" or Allah is greater, greater than the God of
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
According
to Christian theology, it was the Lucifer, Satan, the angel fallen from
grace who said he was "greater" than God. Allah therefore can be
considered a form of Satan. It is interesting that as a Jew, I cannot
preach this theology in synagogues, but I do in churches of all
denominations, and this concept of God vs. Satan/Allah is accepted as
theologically sound and in conformance with Christian theology.
In
the seventh conversation . . . Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos touches on
the theme of Islamic Jihad or holy war. The emperor must have known
that Surah 2, 256 reads: "There is no compulsion in religion".
According to the experts, this is one of the suras of the early period,
when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the
emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the
Qur'an, concerning holy war.
One
mustn't forget the circumstances surrounding the life of Emperor Manuel
II Palaiologos. When he ascended to the throne of the Byzantine Empire
in 1391, his empire was a mere shadow of what was once Byzantium or the
Eastern Roman Empire. His territory was comprised merely of three small
enclaves surrounding Constantinople, Salonica and a small part of the
Peloponnese.
It
must not be forgotten that Manuel's wife was Helena Dragas, the
daughter of the Serbian prince Constantine Dragas. And that the Serbs
lost a very important battle in 1389, two years before his ascension to
the throne. It was the battle of Kosovo Field, a great defeat for the
Serbs, the Balkans, and Christianity.
So
what Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos was responding to in his discourses
with the Persian philosopher was that Christians were being defeated
and massacred by the Moslems in the heart of Europe! The Byzantine Empire was rapidly reaching its demise.
One
mustn't forget that the Byzantine Empire used to include all of
Anatolia (modern day Turkey), the Balkans, and the Middle East. By
1391, there was already virtually no Byzantine Empire left.
In
1453, only 28 years after the death of Manuel II Palaiologos on 21st
July 1425, the Byzantine Empire was dealt its final death blow by the
Moslem Turks. Constantinople fell to the besiegers.
The following is an article by Robert Spencer posted on May 30th, 2006.
"On
Tuesday, May 29th, 1453, the armies of the Ottoman Sultan Mehmet II
entered Constantinople, breaking through the defenses of a vastly
outnumbered and indomitably courageous Byzantine force. Historian
Steven Runciman notes what happened next: the Muslim soldiers "slew
everyone that they met in the streets, men, women and children without
discrimination. The blood ran in rivers down the steep streets from the
heights of Petra toward the Golden Horn. But soon the lust for
slaughter was assuaged. The soldiers realized that captives and
precious objects would bring them greater profit." (The Fall of
Constantinople 1453, Cambridge University Press, 1965, p. 145.)
It
has come to be known as Black Tuesday, the Last Day of the World. The
jihadists also entered the Hagia Sophia, which for nearly a thousand
years had been the grandest church in Christendom. The faithful had
gathered within its hallowed walls to pray during the city's last
agony. The Muslims, according to Runciman, halted the celebration of
Orthros (morning prayer); the priests, according to legend, took the
sacred vessels and disappeared into the cathedral's eastern wall,
through which they shall return to complete the divine service one day.
Muslim men then killed the elderly and weak and led the rest off into
slavery.
Once
the Muslims had thoroughly subdued Constantinople, they set out to
Islamize it. According to the Muslim chronicler Hoca Sa'deddin, tutor
of the 16th-century Sultans Murad III and Mehmed III, "churches which
were within the city were emptied of their vile idols and cleansed from
the filthy and idolatrous impurities and by the defacement of their
images and the erection of Islamic prayer niches and pulpits many
monasteries and chapels became the envy of the gardens of Paradise."
Tuesday has been regarded as unlucky by superstitious Greeks ever since. Why did this happen?
1.
Realpolitik. Short-sighted Byzantine Emperors such as John VI
Cantacuzenes made ill-advised alliances with the Ottomans; in 1347 he
invited them into Europe to aid them in a dynastic dispute, and they
haven't left yet. 2. Disunity. The Western European powers were
themselves disunited and preoccupied with their own affairs.
Compounding that was the fact that they couldn't rally much support for
a bailout of the Byzantines without an ecclesiastical unity that, when
it was affected on paper by the Patriarch of Constantinople and the
Emperor, was rejected by the people of the Empire. The force the West
finally sent was too small, and it was annihilated by the Muslims at
Varna in Bulgaria in 1444. Far too many Westerners didn't see the peril
of Constantinople as their peril, and far too many Easterners
subscribed to the Byzantine official Lukas Notaras' quip: "Better the
turban of the Sultan than the Tiara of the Pope.
Meanwhile,
the world has forgotten what happened on Black Tuesday, and so many
other days like it from India to Spain, and persists in the fantasy
that Islam does not contain an imperialist impulse and that Muslims can
be admitted without limit into Western countries without any attempt to
determine how many would like ultimately to subjugate and Islamicize
their new countries, the way their forefathers did to Constantinople so
long ago.
And
today we see the same ill-informed games of realpolitik, pragmatic
alliances made with those who would conquer and subjugate us, and the
same disunity and finger-pointing at each other instead of unity in the
face of this threat to our common survival.
It
is fitting that Black Tuesday coincided this year with Memorial Day.
For only a strong defense – not just military, but cultural and
spiritual, a civilizational defense – will conquer the forces of Jihad
and keep there from being many more Black Tuesdays, many more Last Days
of the World. May we mount that defense, speedily.
This
leads me now to another part of the world, Spain. Now as a Jew, I
always hated King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella, "Los Reyes Catolicos"
for what they did to my people, the Jews, in Spain. The same applies
for the vast majority of Jews. My Egyptian born wife, Rachel, traces
her lineage back to Turkey and Morocco, two Islamic countries which
gave asylum to the Jews expelled from northern Christian Spain in 1391
and later from Granada in 1492. Rachel's family lived in Fez, Morocco,
and Istanbul, Turkey for centuries until they immigrated to Egypt.
For
Jewish people, 1492 was a kind of Holocaust in which over 100,000 Jews
were killed in an Inquisition which was to last three hundred years in
Spain, Portugal and the Americas. It was the end of the Golden Age of
Spanish Jewry, a period of great science, culture, philosophy, wisdom
peace and prosperity for all under the Moorish kings.
Spain,
like many other parts of the Mediterranean Sea, was settled and
influenced by Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, Vandals, Goths, and Moslems.
The Jews were also there from Day 1.
Unlike
Byzantium, Spain in 711 was just becoming Christianized having been
pagan, and was under the rule of the Goths and Vandals (hence the name
Andalucia is derived from Vandalucia or Vandals.) There was no real
centralized rule in Iberia and it was easy for the Arab invaders to
sweep through the feudal Iberian peninsula: Spain, Portugal and much of
France leading up to the battle of Poitiers only 21 years later. This
was the beginning of the "Reconquista" or re-conquest of the Iberian
Peninsula by the Christians which took place in stages over a period of
almost 800 years.
French
history speaks proudly of Charles Martel and Roland. The Spanish boast
of the victories of El Cid Campeador, all Christian heroes in the
battle to expel the Moslem invaders during centuries of battle.
Portugal
was finally freed in 1147 (in the Middle of the Crusades in the Holy
Land 1096-1293). And by 1492, all that was left in Spain of Islamic
rule was the Moorish Kingdom of Granada in the South.
But
it must be remembered that wave after wave of fanatic Islamic invasions
came across the Straits of Gibraltar from Morocco to constantly
reinforce the Moslem presence in Spain. The Christian re-conquest of
Spain resembled waves of a sea pounding the beach and then slowly
receding. The tide was slowly but surely moving ever-southward and
against Islam in Spain.
There
seems to be a disconnect in the minds of scholars who specialize in the
history of either Western Europe or the Byzantine East. Today's
scholars don't see that one directly influenced the other. And in many
sections of today's academia, people neither know nor care.
When
Constantinople finally fell in 1453, this was not only a localized
victory on the Bosporus. This Turkish-Islamic victory now meant the end
of the Italian city-states that made their livelihoods through the silk
route to India and China over the now Turkish mainland. Not only did
the Italians such as the traders of Genoa and Venice experience
bankruptcy, but now, the entire Renaissance in Europe was threatened.
The Turks, by conquering Constantinople and renaming it Istanbul now
had a stranglehold on Christendom.
Is
it any wonder that Christopher Columbus, the now unemployed Genoese
maritime explorer, now tried to offer his services to Portugal only to
be rejected and then later to Spain and was accepted? Queen Isabella
reputedly had to sell her jewels to pay for the Nina, Pinta and Santa
Maria caravels Columbus had built for his journey.
As
a pupil in American schools in the 50's and 60's I will never forget
the romanticized version of Columbus's voyage westward to "prove that
the world was round." This is the stuff a Steven Spielberg movie is
made of.
But
the facts were as follows: The Turks controlled the Mediterranean in
1492, so there was not much to look for sailing eastward. And secondly,
the Turkish navies and armies were already positioned in North Africa,
just across the Straits of Gibraltar and were preparing to invade Spain
just as the Moors had been doing for almost 800 years.
In
order to prevent just such an invasion, King Ferdinand and Queen
Isabella decided to expel every last Moslem (and their Jewish allies)
from Spain to make sure there was no Islamic foothold in Iberia.
Unfortunately for the Jews, they were clearly identified as being
totally in league with the Moslems, so by choosing the losing side, the
Jews were expelled together with the Moslems.
I
was in Spain in 2004. I drove from Valladolid in the north to Gibraltar
in the south. Although Spain is a high plateau, it is primarily a
plain. But once one reaches the highway 5 intersection at Bailen, one
can see the mountains of Granada looming to the south.
As
an Israel Defense Forces spokesman in the reserves for fourteen years,
I was trained to understand that there would never be a Palestinian
State in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, because whoever controlled the hills
overlooking Israel's Mediterranean coast would eventually control the
coast as well, meaning the destruction of Israel.
So,
too, it became clear to me that with all the pain for me as a Jew to
see the expulsion of my people from Granada in 1492, Spain had no
choice but to expel the Moslems and their Jewish allies, because the
Turks were preparing another wave of invasions for Spain. King
Ferdinand and Queen Isabella must not be judged simply for being
anti-Semitic, but for saving Christian and European civilization from
Islam.
The
last king of Granada, Boabdil, reputedly a pacifist, a liberal and an
intellectual, refused to fight the Catholics to the north and preferred
to go into exile in Morocco. "No war is worth it," was Boabdil's credo,
so out went the Jews and Moslems from Granada. When he stood crying on
the balcony of his palace in Granada preparing for his exile, his
mother reputedly said to King Boabdil: "Don't cry like a woman for
kingdom you wouldn't fight for like a man."
In
came the Catholic barbarians with their Inquisition, auto-da-fe and
burnings at the stake. The strategic decision was taken. The Moslems
were not going to be allowed to have a foothold in Spain to make it
easy for the Turks to invade.
Returning
for a moment to Columbus, one of great accomplishments of Columbus and
later all the other Christian explorers was the opening up of the
Americas, Australia and the Philippines to Christian colonization. Now
Christendom was no longer a dozen or so beleaguered countries in
Europe. Now Christendom was the world.
Another
accomplishment of the Spanish conquistadores with all their barbaric
behavior toward the American natives was that the gold and silver mined
by Pizarro in Peru and Cortes in Mexico was sent to Spain to build new
fleets of ships and train new armies "For the glory of Christ."
It
was in 1563 at the Battle of Lepanto that the Spanish Armada decimated
the Turkish navy. This meant the end of Turkish control in the
Mediterranean. It must not be forgotten as well, that the royal house
of Spain intermarried now with the Hapsburg Dynasty in Austria, so that
if the Turks were besieging Vienna, Austria, then Spain had to fight on
the side of the Austrians. It must not be forgotten that the Turks were
"parked" outside the gates of Vienna for 200 years!
It
is also interesting for me as former American student that we were
never taught about the Battle of Lepanto of 1563, but we were taught
about the English/Dutch victory over the Spanish Armada in 1588,
because it was a victory of the Protestants over the Catholics! But
such a milestone victory of the Catholics over the Islamic Turks which
saved Europe from being overwhelmed by Islam went untaught in American
schools because this time, it was a Catholic victory.
One
must not forget also that Sicily and southern Italy were conquered and
ruled by Islam for close to 500 years until liberated by Christian
Italy.
As
a student of Russian and Eastern European Studies at Hebrew University
in 1968-71, I had the opportunity to write a seminar paper on the
Balkan Wars of 1902, 1903 and 1912. It was during these wars that
Ottoman Turkey was finally pushed back virtually to the Bosphorus.
This
is not a question of ancient history. The Turks controlled large
portions of Eastern Europe for about 600 years. They were expelled from
much of Europe as part of a process that ended in 1912, less than a
century ago.
But
now, peoples such as the Albanians and Bosnians, who until five hundred
years ago were Christians, and then converted to Islam under the Turks
are now working actively to re-conquer Europe for Allah and create a
land bridge from the Adriatic Sea to Anatolia.
President
Bill Clinton played an active role in punishing the Christian Serbs, in
the best tradition of the Moslems and Nazis by taking away historic
Serbian/Christian lands and giving them to the Moslems to create two
new Islamic states in Europe in addition to Albania: Bosnia and Kosovo.
Macedonia, which has a 40% Islamic population is next, I believe, to
become a Moslem state. It will not take long before the Balkans are
Islamized and returned to the bosom of Turkey.
Even
democratic Greece under the Socialist PASOK Party made the mistake of
inviting 500,000 Moslems from Albania to settle in Greece. Together
with the 100,000 Turkish Moslems of Thrace, the total Moslem population
of Greece now reaches 6%. With reproduction rates the way they are, the
Moslems in a few decades will take Greece as well, especially if Turkey
is admitted to the European Union.
One
mustn't forget that during the disastrous Venizelos war against Turkey
in 1923, there were 10 million Greeks and 10 million Turks. Today there
are 10 million Greeks and 70 million Turks.
My
wife, Rachel, and I had the opportunity to lecture in seven Swiss
cities in 2003. We were often confronted by Moslems who came to my
lectures. I even made first page of Saudi Arabia's largest newspaper
"Al-Watan" as well as one of the biggest Arabic newspapers in the world
"Al-Sharq al-Ausat" for warning Europe (in Islamic opinion –
besmirching Islam) of the Islamic threat.
Some
of these Moslems said to my wife in Arabic: "The Europeans colonized us
for centuries. Now it is Islam's turn to colonize Europe."
Getting
back to Pope Benedict XVI, in response to these recent protests, the
Vatican appeared to offer apologies of sorts -- ranging from claims
that the Pope's statement had been misunderstood to a declaration that
the quotation did not indicate the Pope's own view of Islam. It may
take some time for the confusion to clear.
In
Nostra Aetate, also known as the "Declaration on the Relation of the
Church to Non-Christian Religions," proclaimed by Pope Paul VI on
October 28, 1965, the church declared:
The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God,
living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the
Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains
to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as
Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself,
submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they
revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at
times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the
Day of Judgment when God will render their desserts to all those who
have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life
and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.
Since in the course of centuries not a few quarrels and hostilities have
arisen between Christians and Moslems, this sacred synod urges all to
forget the past and to work sincerely for mutual understanding and to
preserve as well as to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom.
Similarly, in Lumen Gentium, another major document from the Second Vatican Council, the church defined its understanding of Islam in these words:
But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place amongst these there are the Mohammedans, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind.
In other words, the Catholic Church teaches that Muslims are included in the economy of salvation by virtue of the fact that they worship the one true God. We do not claim or worship the same God.
What about the Pope's comments in Germany?
The use of specific words and the citation of an ancient authority do not obscure the fact that the Pope's comments were largely accurate, and most accurate at the point of the greatest outrage. Islam and Christianity are locked in a spiritual and theological conflict.
The logic of Islam -- based in the goal of universal Qur'anic rule --
ensures that this will be one of the defining conflicts of the present
age.
Pope
Benedict XVI is right to see Islam as a threat to secular Europe, a
continent that is determined to undermine the very foundation that gave
it birth. The Pope's concerns about secularism and encroaching Islam
are based in reality. If these trends are unchecked, Europe will become
the new territory of Islam. As author Melanie Phillips warns, London is
fast becoming Londonistan.
Thanks for input from Al Mohler, Joel Griffith and Robert Spencer.
From http://www.vicmord.com/Newsletter1Elul5767September2006.html

|